Savonius wind generator including theory, detailed design and materials list with excellent photographs and description.
On the Performance of the Savonius Wind Turbine
An extensive wind tunnel test program is described which assesses the relative
influence of system parameters on the Savonius rotor performance. The
parametric study leads to an optimum configuration with an increase in efficiency
by around 100 percent compared to the reported efficiency of ≈ 12-15 percent.
Of particular interest is the blockage correction procedure which is vital for
application of the wind tunnel results to a prototype design, and facilitates
comparison of data obtained by other investigators. Next, using the concept of a
central vortex, substantiated by a flow visualization study, a semi empirical
approach to predict the rotor performance using measured stationary blade
pressure data is developed. The simple approach promises to be quite effective
in predicting the rotor performance, even in the presence of blockage, and
should prove useful at least in the preliminary design stages.
Introduction
The Savonius rotor concept never became popular, until recently, probably
because of its low efficiency. However, it has the following advantages over the
other conventional wind turbines:
- simple and cheap construction;
- acceptance of wind from any direction thus eliminating the need for
reorientation;
- high starting torque;
- relatively low operating speed (rpm).
The above advantages may not outweigh its low efficiency and make it an ideal
economical source to meet small scale power requirements, especially in the
rural parts of developing countries. ----- The concept of the Savonius rotor was
based on the principle developed by Flettner. Savonius used a rotor which was
formed by cutting the Flettner cylinder into two halves along the central plane
and then moving the two semicylindrical surfaces sideways along the cutting
plane so that the cross-section resembled the letter “S.” -----
The following are some rules for construction of a Savonius rotor.
a. The size of the end plates, to which are mounted the buckets, should
be about 5% larger than the diameter of the rotor.
b. The central shaft should be mounted to the end plates only, and not
through the buckets. By keeping the shaft to the end plates, the air
space is not blocked. For example, a central shaft of about 20% of the
rotor diameter reduces the power coefficient by about 8%.
c. The aspect ratio, height to diameter, 6 to 8 gives a better performance.
However, an aspect ratio of about 2 is desirable from the economic
point of view.
d. Use only two buckets, as a higher number reduces the efficiency.
e. The use of augmentation devices such as concentrators or diffusers or
combination of the two result in increased power coefficient. Again,
the increased costs of such devices should be weighed against the
increased capital cost and complexities.
|